Analysis of Maternal Critical Care at the Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Introduction: Perinatal admissions to Critical Care are increasing due to rising maternal age, obesity, and comorbid disease.1 The MBRRACE Report 2021 stated that of 191 maternal deaths in 2017-2019, only 17% had good care.2 Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a subjective increase in perinatal admissions to Mid Yorkshire Hospitals Critical Care. Objective(s): To investigate whether MYH Critical Care maternal admissions have increased, if there has been a change in admission trends and to evaluate the care of critically ill pregnant and postpartum women compared to FICM standards.3 Methods: Retrospective audit of notes of all pregnant and up to 6 weeks postpartum women admitted to critical care between 24/02/2019 and 05/09/2021. Data collected included gestation, duration of admission, organ support, days reviewed by obstetrics and mortality outcomes. Result(s): * There was 1 maternal death and 3 fetal deaths during the study period * 50% of the admissions were antenatal and 50% were postnatal * During the COVID-19 pandemic we have seen a 47% increased rate of admissions from 1 per 29 critical care bed days to 1 per 19 critical care bed days * 50% of patients were supported with ventilation and CPAP during admission, 13% with CPAP only. Prior to the COVID pandemic, no maternal admission required CPAP on our Critical Care unit during the data collection period * 63% of patients were reviewed by obstetrics at least one during their admission, but obstetric review was documented on only 37 of 112 patient days * There is no critical care SOP for perimortem Caesarean section * There is no specialist neonatal resuscitation equipment available on ICU * There is no named ICM consultant responsible for Maternal Critical Care * There is no SOP for support of maternal contact with baby * There is no critical care/obstetric services MDT follow-up Conclusion(s): This study shows that Critical Care admissions have increased, and that care does not follow all the FICM recommendations. Considering this, the following recommendations have been made: * Introduce an SOP and simulation training for peri-mortem section * Introduce neonatal resuscitation equipment box * Nomination of a named ICM Consultant lead for Maternal Critical Care to ensure quality of care and act as liaison * Train critical care staff in supporting contact between a mother and baby, with support from midwifery services * Introduction of Obstetric and Critical Care MDT follow-up.

#ButNotMaternity: Analysing Instagram posts of reproductive politics under pandemic crisis

In this article, we perform a thematic analysis of a sample of 70 #ButNotMaternity Instagram posts. #ButNotMaternity is a hashtag that emerged in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic whereby the public, healthcare workers and campaigners shared experiences and concerns about pandemic maternity care restrictions and their disproportionate disadvantages for pregnant women. In the article, we analyse four themes that emerged from our thematic analysis – Individual experiences, loneliness and overcoming adversity, Voicing anger and absurdity, Mobilising anger and calls to action and Coordinated activism. Thinking about #ButNotMaternity in the context of ‘freelance feminism', our article has a twofold aim. First, we explore the concept of ‘freelance feminism' through #ButNotMaternity, asking to what extent this campaign draws from freelance tactics. Second, we use the hashtag to illuminate maternity inequality and modes of resistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through our thematic analysis, we argue that while ‘freelance feminism' might be becoming hegemonic as a dominant mode of organising feminist activism and resistance, inspired by Malik et al. (2020), we also showcase how creative campaigns are potential places where collective action, structural critique and resistance may emerge. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of European Journal of Cultural Studies is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Birth, death and isolation: Motherhood during a pandemic

This chapter draws out the existential themes that have emerged for mothers during the Covid-19 pandemic and how they have had an impact on their lives. Birth, death and motherhood are all corporeal events which ground people in the physical dimension. Whereas the physical dimension of maternity in the pandemic was dominated by the safety and risk pole of existence for mothers, in the social dimension the focus was on isolation and belonging;and these two dimensions became interconnected. The way in which the issues of mortality and natality, of life and death, were manifested in women during the pandemic was through a preoccupation with the safety and risk pole of existence, which in turn led to worry, anxiety and fear. For women, those wanting to conceive during the pandemic it became a mission of trying to plan for the unknown. For the majority of women, the thought of giving birth is often felt with trepidation and anxiety about what will happen and how the birth will proceed but at the same time excitement and anticipation of finally meeting their baby. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Association of workload and practice of respectful maternity care among the healthcare providers, before and during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in South Western Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Respectful maternity care is an approach that involves respecting women's belief, choices, emotions, and dignity during the childbirth process. As the workload among maternity care workforce affects intrapartum quality care, respectful maternity care might have also been affected, particularly during the pandemic. Thus, this study was conducted to examine the association between workload among healthcare providers and their practice of respectful maternity care, before and during the early phase of pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in South Western Nepal. A total of 267 healthcare providers from 78 birthing centers were included. Data collection was done through telephone interviews. The exposure variable was workload among the healthcare providers, and the outcome variable was respectful maternity care practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multilevel mixed-effect linear regression was used to examine the association. RESULTS: The median client-provider ratio before and during the pandemic was 21.7 and 13.0, respectively. The mean score of respectful maternity care practice was 44.5 (SD 3.8) before the pandemic, which was decreased to 43.6 (SD 4.5) during the pandemic. Client-provider ratio was negatively associated with respectful maternity care practice for both times; before (Coef. -5.16; 95% CI -8.41 to -1.91) and during (Coef. -7.47; 95% CI -12.72 to -2.23) the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: While a higher client-provider was associated with a lower respectful maternity care practice score both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the coefficient was larger during the pandemic. Therefore, workload among the healthcare providers should be considered before the implementation of respectful maternity care, and more attention should be given during the pandemic.

Women's experience of perinatal support in a high migrant Australian population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: As a COVID-19 risk mitigation measure, Australia closed its international borders for two years with significant socioeconomic disruption including impacting approximately 30% of the Australian population who are migrants. Migrant populations during the peripartum often rely on overseas relatives visiting for social support. High quality social support is known to lead to improved health outcomes with disruption to support a recognised health risk. AIM: To explore women's experience of peripartum social support during the COVID-19 pandemic in a high migrant population. To quantify type and frequency of support to identify characteristics of vulnerable perinatal populations for future pandemic preparedness. METHODS: A mixed methods study with semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey was conducted from October 2020 to April 2021. A thematic approach was used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 24 participants interviewed both antenatally and postnatally (22 antenatal; 18 postnatal). Fourteen women were migrants and 10 Australian born. Main themes included; 'Significant disruption and loss of peripartum support during the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing impact for migrant women'; 'Husbands/partners filling the support gap' and 'Holding on by a virtual thread'. Half of the participants felt unsupported antenatally. For Australian born women, this dissipated postnatally, but migrants continued to feel unsupported. Migrant women discussed partners stepped into traditional roles and duties of absent mothers and mothers-in-law who were only available virtually. CONCLUSION: This study identified disrupted social support for migrant women during the pandemic, providing further evidence that the pandemic has disproportionately impacted migrant populations. However, the benefits identified in this study included high use of virtual support, which could be leveraged for improving clinical care in the present and in future pandemics. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted most women's peripartum social support with migrant families having ongoing disruption. Gains in the pandemic included greater gender equity for domestic work as husbands/partners increased their contribution to domestic work and childcare.

'An extra level of kind of torment': Views and experiences of recurrent miscarriage care during the initial phases of COVID-19 in Ireland-A qualitative interview study.

INTRODUCTION: Maternity services underwent much change during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research on the impact on miscarriage care and experiences during this time is sparse. Within a national evaluation of recurrent miscarriage care, we qualitatively explored stakeholder views and experiences of recurrent miscarriage services in Ireland. This study describes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on those experiences and perceptions of care. METHODS: People with professional and lived experience of recurrent miscarriage and service engagement were actively involved in this qualitative study from idea generation to analysis and reporting. We recruited women and men with two or more consecutive first-trimester miscarriages, and people involved in the management/delivery of recurrent miscarriage services and supports. We used purposive sampling to ensure that perspectives across disciplinary or lived experience, geographical, and health service administrative areas, were included. We conducted semi-structured interviews, virtually all due to COVID-19 restrictions, between June 2020 and February 2021. These were audio-recorded, and data were transcribed, and subsequently analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 42 service providers and 13 women and 7 men with experience of recurrent miscarriage. We actively generated two central themes during data analysis. The first-'Disconnected'-describes how many women navigated miscarriage diagnosis and management and care in subsequent pregnancies alone; many felt that this resulted in increased trauma. At the same time, men struggled with not being present to support their partners and described feeling disconnected. The second theme highlighted 'The perceived dispensability of recurrent miscarriage services and supports'. Some service providers felt that service reduction and redeployment demonstrated a lack of value in the service. Virtual clinics facilitated access to services, but a preference for in-person care was highlighted. CONCLUSION: Our analysis provides rich insights into the significant impacts that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the way recurrent miscarriage care is provided and experienced, with important implications for early pregnancy, miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage care. Services have undergone significant changes and, while these may be temporary, how services should be delivered in the future requires consideration, particularly given the deficits in care and care experiences highlighted prepandemic. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of the multidisciplinary RE:CURRENT Project Research Advisory Group (including four parent advocates, two of whom are co-authors on this article) were actively involved throughout the study, including the generation of topic guides and the refining of themes.

Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in Israel during the COVID-19 pandemic: a subset of the IMAgiNE EURO cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic have negatively affected breastfeeding support and outcomes in hospitals in many countries. The aims of the study were to describe exclusive breastfeeding rates and identify factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge among women who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. METHODS: A cross-sectional online anonymous survey based on WHO standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities was conducted among a sample of women who gave birth to a healthy singleton infant in Israel during the pandemic (between March 2020 and April 2022). The socio-ecological approach was employed to examine intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, and community/society factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge according to women perspectives. RESULTS: Among the 235 Israeli participants, 68.1% exclusively breastfed, 27.7% partially breastfed, and 4.2% did not breastfeed at discharge. Results of the adjusted logistic regression model showed that factors significantly associated with exclusive breastfeeding were the intrapersonal factor of multiparity (adjusted OR 2.09; 95% Confidence Interval 1.01,4.35) and the organizational factors of early breastfeeding in the first hour (aOR 2.17; 95% CI 1.06,4.45), and rooming-in (aOR 2.68; 95% CI 1.41,5.07). CONCLUSIONS: Facilitating early breastfeeding initiation and supporting rooming-in are critical to promoting exclusive breastfeeding. These factors, reflecting hospital policies and practices, along with parity, are significantly associated with breastfeeding outcomes and highlight the influential role of the maternity environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Maternity care in hospitals should follow evidence-based breastfeeding recommendations also during the pandemic, promoting early exclusive breastfeeding and rooming-in among all women, with particular attention to providing lactation support to primiparous women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT04847336.

Experiences of Norwegian co-parents during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions: A qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions have had a major impact on the organization of health services in Europe. Co-parents' experiences of not being allowed to fully participate during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period is poorly understood. We investigated how the non-birthing partner experienced becoming a parent during the pandemic. METHODS: We applied a qualitative design. We recruited the participants from all part of the country by using snowball sampling. 18 individual interviews were conducted by using videotelephony software program/telephone. The transcripts were analysed using a six-step model for thematic analysis. RESULTS: The non-birthing participants were not considered by the healthcare system to be equal partners in terms of their involvement in the process of becoming parents. Three themes were constructed from the interview analysis- deprivation of the opportunity of "doing their part" of the job; participation by proxy to enhance togetherness; and choosing between obedience or opposition to the restrictions. CONCLUSION: The non-birthing co-parents felt deprived of doing what they considered to be their most important job-namely, to support and comfort their partners during pregnancy and childbirth. The healthcare system's decision to exclude co-parents from being physically present thus requires further reflection and discussion.

Reflective, pragmatic, and reactive decision-making by maternity service providers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic health system shock: a qualitative, grounded theory analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant and postpartum women were identified as having particular vulnerability to severe symptomatology of SARS-CoV-2 infection, so maternity services significantly reconfigured their care provision. We examined the experiences and perceptions of maternity care staff who provided care during the pandemic in South London, United Kingdom - a region of high ethnic diversity with varied levels of social complexity. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative interview study, as part of a service evaluation between August and November 2020, using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a range of staff (N = 29) working in maternity services. Data were analysed using Grounded Theory analysis appropriate to cross-disciplinary health research. ANALYSIS & FINDINGS: Maternity healthcare professionals provided their views, experiences, and perceptions of delivering care during the pandemic. Analysis rendered three emergent themes regarding decision-making during reconfigured maternity service provision, organised into pathways: 1) 'Reflective decision-making'; 2) 'Pragmatic decision-making'; and 3) 'Reactive decision-making'. Whilst pragmatic decision-making was found to disrupt care, reactive-decision-making was perceived to devalue the care offered and provided. Alternatively, reflective decision-making, despite the difficult working conditions of the pandemic, was seen to benefit services, with regards to care of high-quality, sustainability of staff, and innovation within the service. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making within maternity care was found to take three forms - where at best changes to services could be innovative, at worst they could cause devaluation in care being delivered, and more often than not, these changes were disruptive. With regard to positive changes, healthcare providers identified staff empowerment, flexible working patterns (both for themselves and collectively as teams), personalised care delivery, and change-making in general, as key areas to capitalise on current and ongoing innovations borne out of the pandemic. Key learnings included a focus on care-related, meaningful listening and engagement of staff at all levels, in order to drive forward high-quality care and avoid care disruption and devaluation.

Classics and the Precariat

WHEN I (CHIARA) TOOK UP MY POSITION at Vanderbilt in 2016, I was given a one-year contract. Since I teach at a well-resourced university, there was a network of child care centers where I could enroll my child—a nice perk that many academic jobs do not include. While those with full-time or tenure-stream positions may not have had to worry about health insurance coverage or paid sick leave (Douglas-Gabriel 2020), questions continue to abound over hiring, pay freezes or cuts (Woolston 2021), parental leave policies and tenure clock extensions, as colleges and universities have scrambled to develop clear and equitable responses to the crisis. [...]the grand revelation of COVID is that, in the words of Chris Caterine, author of Leaving Academia, "All faculty are contingent.” For this reason, programs should be encouraged to work toward converting long-term contingent faculty members into tenured or tenure-track hires whenever possible, or to ensure that contingent positions have as much security and permanence as possible through the use of longer-term contracts.

Adoption of mHealth Technologies by Community Health Workers to Improve the Use of Maternal Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Protocol for a Mixed Method Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that mobile health technologies (mHealth) enhance the use of maternal health services. However, there is limited evidence of the impact of mHealth use by community health workers (CHWs) on the use of maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: This mixed method systematic review will explore the impact of mHealth use by CHWs on the use of the maternal health continuum of care (antenatal care, intrapartum care, and postnatal care [PNC]), as well as barriers and facilitators of mHealth use by CHWs when supporting maternal health services. METHODS: We will include studies that report the impact of mHealth by CHWs on the use of antenatal care, facility-based births, and PNC visits in sub-Saharan Africa. We will search 6 databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Africa Index Medicus), with additional articles identified from Google Scholar and manual screening of references of the included studies. The included studies will not be limited by language or year of publication. After study selection, 2 independent reviewers will perform title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening to identify the final papers to be included. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment will be performed using Covidence software by 2 independent reviewers. We will use a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to perform risk-of-bias assessments on all included studies. Finally, we will perform a narrative synthesis of the outcomes, integrating information about the effect of mHealth on maternal health use and barriers and facilitators of mHealth use. This protocol follows the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) guidelines. RESULTS: In September 2022, we conducted an initial search in the eligible databases. After removing duplicates, we identified 1111 studies that were eligible for the title and abstract screening. We will finalize the full-text assessment for eligibility, data extraction, assessment of methodological quality, and narrative synthesis by June 2023. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review will present new and up-to-date evidence on the use of mHealth by CHWs along the pregnancy, childbirth, and PNC continuum of care. We anticipate the results will inform program implementation and policy by highlighting the potential impacts of mHealth and presenting contextual factors that should be addressed to ensure the success of the programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022346364; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=346364. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44066.

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on postnatal depression: analysis of three population-based national maternity surveys in England (2014-2020).

Background: Few studies have evaluated postnatal depression before and during the Covid-19 pandemic using comparable data across time. We used data from three national maternity surveys in England to compare prevalence and risk factors for postnatal depression before and during the pandemic. Methods: Analysis was conducted using population-based surveys carried out in 2014 (n = 4571), 2018 (n = 4509), and 2020 (n = 4611). Weighted prevalence estimates for postnatal depression (EPDS score ≥13) were compared across surveys. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) for the association between sociodemographic, pregnancy- and birth-related, and biopsychosocial factors, and postnatal depression. Findings: Prevalence of postnatal depression increased from 10.3% in 2014 to 16.0% in 2018 (difference = +5.7% (95% CI: 4.0-7.4); RR = 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36-1.77)) and to 23.9% in 2020 (difference = +7.9% (95% CI: 5.9-9.9); RR = 1.49 (95% CI: 1.34-1.66)). Having a long-term mental health problem (aRR range = 1.48-2.02), antenatal anxiety (aRR range = 1.73-2.12) and antenatal depression (aRR range = 1.44-2.24) were associated with increased risk of postnatal depression, whereas satisfaction with birth (aRR range = 0.89-0.92) and social support (aRR range = 0.73-0.78) were associated with decreased risk before and during the pandemic. Interpretation: This analysis indicates that Covid-19 had an important negative impact on postnatal women's mental health and may have accelerated an existing trend of increasing prevalence of postnatal depression. Risk factors for postnatal depression were consistent before and during the pandemic. Timely identification, intervention and follow-up are key to supporting women at risk, and it is essential that mechanisms to support women are strengthened during times of heightened risk such as the pandemic. Funding: NIHR Policy Research Programme.

Reproductive intentions of Russians with children at the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic

The paper studies the reproductive intentions of the Russians who already have at least one child before and during the quarantine restrictions (lockdowns) due to COVID-19. Binary choice logistic models and a set of machine learning models were evaluated on the data from the Person, Family, Society survey conducted in March-May 2020. Modeling of the respondents ' intentions to have more children in the short term (3 years) and the long term (more than 3 years) showed that external shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the strict quarantine regulations associated with it had an impact on fertility intentions, but only in the short term. These external shocks were less significant than such factors as age of the respondent;the number of children already born;availability of housing needed to expand the family;the maternity capital program availability, which includes the opportunity to improve housing conditions after the birth of children. As Russians with children showed the increase of the probability of having additional children after April 2020, we conclude that the effect of COVID-19 on reproductive intentions was acyclical. The estimation of models with heterogeneous effects showed that the pandemic had a stronger impact on respondents with above-average household incomes.

"It was just one moment that I felt like I was being judged": Pregnant and postpartum black Women's experiences of personal and group-based racism during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Racial inequities in maternal and child health outcomes persist: Black women and birthing people experience higher rates of adverse outcomes than their white counterparts. Similar inequities are seen in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) mortality rates. In response, we sought to explore the intersections of racism and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on the daily lives and perinatal care experiences of Black birthing people. METHODS: We used an intrinsic case study approach grounded in an intersectional lens to collect stories from Black pregnant and postpartum people residing in Fresno County (July-September 2020). All interviews were conducted on Zoom without video and were audio recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into larger themes. RESULTS: Of the 34 participants included in this analysis, 76.5% identified as Black only, and 23.5% identified as multiracial including Black. Their mean age was 27.2 years [SD, 5.8]. Nearly half (47%) reported being married or living with their partner; all were eligible for Medi-Cal insurance. Interview times ranged from 23 to 96 min. Five themes emerged: (1) Tensions about Heightened Exposure of Black Lives Matter Movement during the pandemic; (2) Fear for Black Son's Safety; (3) Lack of Communication from Health Care Professionals; (4) Disrespect from Health Care Professionals; and (5) Misunderstood or Judged by Health Care Professionals. Participants stressed that the Black Lives Matter Movement is necessary and highlighted that society views their Black sons as a threat. They also reported experiencing unfair treatment and harassment while seeking perinatal care. CONCLUSIONS: Black women and birthing people shared that exposure to racism has heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic, increasing their levels of stress and anxiety. Understanding how racism impacts Black birthing people's lives and care experiences is critical to reforming the police force and revising enhanced prenatal care models to better address their needs.

Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region.

BACKGROUND: Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking. METHODS: Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. FINDINGS: 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers' number as "insufficient". Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes. INTERPRETATION: Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed. FUNDING: The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.

In brief

Research shows that while inhaling gas and air (Entonox) in labour is safe for mothers and babies, long-term cumulative exposure may carry health risks. Work notice The right to strike The UK government's Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill is, at the time of going to press, at the committee stage in the House of Lords (the first chance for line-by-line examination). Visit bit.ly/ Clementine-register Working mums Maternity leave Careers After Babies research has found that of 848 mothers interviewed, 98% want to return to work after having a child but just 13% can make it work full-time, citing the cost of childcare and lack of flexibility from businesses as the reason. Find out more at hegenbergermedical.com/training Research Healthy eating support Researchers at the University of Hertfordshire are calling for better information on diet and nutrition to be made available to expectant parents.

Measuring the Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Care Pathways

Care pathways in hospitals around the world reported significant disruption during the recent COVID-19 pandemic but measuring the actual impact is more problematic. Process mining can be useful for hospital management to measure the conformance of real-life care to what might be considered normal operations. In this study, we aim to demonstrate that process mining can be used to investigate process changes associated with complex disruptive events. We studied perturbations to accident and emergency (A &E) and maternity pathways in a UK public hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. Co-incidentally the hospital had implemented a Command Centre approach for patient-flow management affording an opportunity to study both the planned improvement and the disruption due to the pandemic. Our study proposes and demonstrates a method for measuring and investigating the impact of such planned and unplanned disruptions affecting hospital care pathways. We found that during the pandemic, both A &E and maternity pathways had measurable reductions in the mean length of stay and a measurable drop in the percentage of pathways conforming to normative models. There were no distinctive patterns of monthly mean values of length of stay nor conformance throughout the phases of the installation of the hospital's new Command Centre approach. Due to a deficit in the available A &E data, the findings for A &E pathways could not be interpreted. © 2023, The Author(s).

Female physician and pregnancy- effect of the amended German maternity protection act on female doctors' careers

In Germany, the 2018 amended Maternity Protection Act frequently leads to fundamental restrictions for female physicians, especially surgeons, and now even also for students impeding the progress of their careers. Our goal was to assess the current situation for pregnant female physicians and students, respectively, and their perspective on this amendment regarding their career path. A nationwide survey was conducted in Germany from December 2020 to February 2021. The questionnaire included 790 female physicians and students who were pregnant after the inception of the amended Act. Those women pregnant after the beginning of the corona pandemic were excluded. The survey revealed that two thirds of female physicians worked a maximum of 50% in their previous professional activity as soon as they reported pregnancy. Amongst medical students this amounted up to 72%. 18% of the female physicians and 17% of the female medical students respectively could not follow the sense of these restrictions. 44% of female medical physicians and 33% of female students felt their career impeded. This led up to 43% amongst female medical doctors and 53% amongst female medical students, respectively, who were concerned to announce their pregnancy. As a consequence, pregnancies were reported at 12 weeks in female physicians compared to 19 weeks in medical students. Analyses of the current survey revealed that a relevant number of female physicians and medical students felt impeded in their career path through the application of the amended Maternity Act. © 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2023.

Welcoming a new-born infant in times of coronavirus: Making the family fabric despite hospital visiting restrictions

The sanitary measures taken within hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in particular during the "first wave" challenged the author in the context of clinical practice in a neonatal intensive care unit. Closing hospitals to visitors for health safety reasons led to preventing new fathers from entering maternity wards and limiting or even prohibiting parental visits to their hospitalised new-borns. How can we devise ways of building the family when the family is emerging or extending under such extreme conditions? Through a few observations and the analysis of a clinical case, the author invites us to rethink practices limiting visits of parents but also of siblings to hospitalised babies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (French) Les mesures sanitaires prises dans les hopitaux durant l'epidemie mondiale de covid-19, notamment au cours de la << premiere vague , sont venues questionner l'auteure dans le cadre de sa pratique au sein d'un service de reanimation neonatale. La fermeture de l'institution hospitaliere aux visiteurs au nom de la securite sanitaire a ainsi conduit a fermer les services de suite de couches aux peres et a limiter, voire interdire, les visites des parents aupres de leur nouveau-ne hospitalise. Comment inventer des moyens de faire famille au moment ou la famille se constitue ou se reamenage dans des conditions aussi extremes ? Au travers de quelques observations et de l'analyse d'un cas clinique, l'auteure invite a repenser les pratiques limitant les visites des parents mais egalement des freres et soeurs aupres des bebes hospitalises. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

El desamparo en relatos: mujeres que son madres en la pandemia de COVID-19

El presente artículo aborda la cuestión del desamparo a partir de los relatos de mujeres que son madres en el contexto del distanciamiento social provocado por la pandemia del COVID-19. Con una base psicoanalítica, se realizó la lectura de 342 relatos, elaborados por mujeres que fueron contactadas a través de las redes sociales, y una revisión narrativa de la literatura sobre el tema del desamparo, con el objetivo de articular los relatos con reflexiones teóricas. Se evidenció que la pandemia provocó que estas mujeres se encontraran profundamente solas, sin ayuda y sin recursos. El desamparo e incluso el desánimo parecen ser elementos clave para analizar la situación de las mujeres que son madres en el contexto del COVID-19 en Brasil.Alternate : O presente trabalho discute a questão do desamparo a partir de relatos de mulheres que são mães no contexto de distanciamento social provocado pela pandemia de covid-19. Com base na psicanálise, realizou-se a leitura de 342 relatos, produzidos por mulheres convidadas via redes sociais, e uma revisão narrativa de literatura sobre o tema do desamparo, visando a articular os relatos com as reflexões teóricas. Destacou-se que a pandemia acarretou a essas mulheres se encontrarem intensamente sozinhas, sem ajuda e sem recursos. O desamparo e, inclusive, o desalento parecem ser elementos fundamentais para analisar a situação das mulheres que são mães no contexto de covid-19 no Brasil.Alternate : This paper addresses the problem of abandonment based on narratives of women who are mothers in the context of the social distancing caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. With a psychoanalytical basis, the reading of 342 accounts produced by women invited via social networks and a narrative review of the literature on abandonment were carried out. The aim was to articulate the narratives and the theoretical reflections. It was noted that the pandemic led these women to find themselves intensely alone, helpless, and without resources. Therefore, abandonment and even dejection seem to be the essential elements for analyzing the situation of women who are mothers in the context of COVID-19 in Brazil.